September 22, 2010

Q&A with Rachel Botsman, co-author of ‘What’s Mine Is Yours’

Posted by: in North America

RACHEL_BOTSMANIn her new book What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption, co-written with Roo Rodgers, Rachel Botsman outlines “a quiet but powerful revolution of collaboration” that’s part of what she sees as a major shift away from hyper-consumption. Driving this are digital tools, environmental consciousness, the downturn and “a renewed belief in the importance of community.” Collaborative Consumption is flourishing online with companies like Zipcar and Netflix (what the book terms “producer service systems”), eBay and Craigslist (“redistribution markets”) and “collaborative lifestyle” sites like CouchSurfing. For more, see Collaborative Consumption (where visitors can practice this themselves by swapping, bartering or gifting their copy of the book and tracking where it travels).

From her home base in Sydney, Botsman talked with us about what this mega-trend means for brands and marketers.

What’s your elevator pitch for this book?

The way I describe Collaborative Consumption has two parts. First, a “big shift” from the 20th century, a time defined by hyper-consumption, to a 21st-century age of Collaborative Consumption is under way. Second, we are entering a new era of consumerism that is marked by trust between strangers, access over ownership and the primacy of experience over more stuff.

Collaborative Consumption itself is about how technology is taking us back or enabling very old market behaviors, like swapping and trading and bartering and lending, but they’re being reinvented in ways and on a scale that’s never been possible before. In the same way that we used to be able to stand in a village square and shake hands and form trust face to face, we’re mimicking the same behaviors in the virtual world, because we now live in a global village, so to speak.

What do you do outside of the book?

My background was in brand and social innovation, but I was, like many people, going through a crisis of conscience because I essentially was just helping companies sell “more.” I tried to have 50 percent of my work be about how we could use sophisticated brand thinking to make socially driven ideas appealing. I’m now focused on helping startups in the Collaborative Consumption space, as well as big brands. The big brands are starting to change the way they talk to people, so that they’re no longer thinking about big campaigns with one monolithic message, but “How do we really understand what it means to build a community and engage with that community, and let that community drive our business and become brand advocates for us?”

You say in the book that Collaborative Consumption is by no means anti-consumer or anti-product. How can companies with a 20th century model of hyper-consumerism adapt?

There are a couple of easy ways. Big companies are going to have to shift from a mind-set of selling more and selling units to selling units of usage and offering shared experiences. If you look at Nike, for example, they still sell products, but they are starting to sell products through shared experiences. Nike Plus is not a form of Collaborative Consumption, but actually it’s a community of runners sharing. So the Nike brand is starting to stand for a lot more than the swoosh on your sneaker—it’s about becoming part of a community of similar athletes. The journey with the consumer no longer finishes at the point of purchase—it starts there.

The other sector you can look to is the car sector, which is transitioning from the business of selling cars to the business of mobility. You can even see the traditional carmakers like Daimler, with car2go, and Peugeot trying to enter the car-sharing market. There’ll be a whole breed of new consumers coming up—for them it’s not about owning the physical car; that’s not how they express their identity. Their identity will be shaped by how they get around. When I’m at a party sometimes, I see people take out their Zipcar membership and their iPhone, and both those things carry a cachet about who they are.

Do you see other major brands moving in this direction?

To be honest, I see very few big brands adapting to the model of Collaborative Consumption yet. What’s happening is a new entrant is coming in and reinventing or disrupting a sector, and then, like most things, the bigger players rush in to adapt. A good example is Airbnb—it matches people looking for rooms with locals who want to rent out space. Time magazine called it “eBay for travel.” It’s reinventing the entire travel industry process, from the booking to the accommodation itself. I believe in the same way that, say, technology changed the way we shared and accessed music, from Napster to iTunes, Airbnb is using social technologies to reinvent the way people access travel experiences.

I think you’ll see, say, Expedia try and build a similar idea into their model as an experiment. And it might work, but I’m not sure it will because these [peer-to-peer travel] companies, this is what they set out to be, and that’s part of what makes them appealing. But you do have the traditional car-hire companies moving into car sharing and you’ve got health insurance brands trying to start bike sharing—so they are trying to do it, but they’re coming at it from an outsider’s perspective.

Are there categories that aren’t really conducive to this? Can any brand be a collaborative brand?

There’s a difference between the brand and the business model. So I think there are certain models, and certain sectors, where the model of sharing and swapping and lending stuff does not work—personal hygiene, for example. But even with food, you see examples like Landshare where, let’s say Mr. Jones has some garden to spare and Mrs. Smith wants to grow food. Landshare matches them, and together they grow their own food.

I would say all brands should be moving to a model of shared experiences and community of some shape and size, and those that don’t will seem like dinosaurs—and become old, stodgy brands.

Your book says that while this trend will mean fewer products are consumed, it doesn’t necessarily mean lower revenue—if a brand can sell ancillary services to its community. Will that be crucial for many businesses?

Absolutely. Again, it comes back down to, in order to commercialize those ancillary services, you have to have a very tight relationship with your—I don’t think people will think of them as consumers—with your members. In the same way that people had loyalty and attachment to the thing, they have to have trust in the relationships and the experience you can provide. You look at the companies that are starting to make money, and they’re building platforms that enable people to be entrepreneurs themselves.

Etsy is a great example. They have a traditional marketplace product model. But then they have a whole additional revenue stream with the likes of Etsy Labs and community support schemes. When you talk to people about Etsy, it’s in their hearts and it’s so much a part of their lives. If Walmart said, “Let’s do Meetups and you can come here and learn how to be a great shopper,” people aren’t going to have the same reaction. I know Walmart and Etsy are extreme ends, but that’s what I’m talking about: You’ve got to build brands with a heart and soul and a purpose. They’re very different types of brands from brands whose purpose was about the next shiny gadget or the latest glossy ad campaign.

Do you think most brands are capable of that kind of change?

I’m an optimist. I think some companies have an entrenched hyper-consumption culture that will be tricky to change. But if they brought in fresh talent and outside perspective, absolutely they could change. We’ve seen how massive companies have repositioned themselves. IBM went from technology to business services; Xerox went from being about copiers and printers to office solutions.

So there’s already a precedent of big companies shifting to a service-led brand. But I think there are very few agencies out there that are giving them the right advice in this space. I think agencies are still very much focused on the frills and fancies of social media as tools versus really understanding how they change behaviors and perceptions.

Your books says, “It takes a community, not a campaign, to build a collaborative brand”—what is the role of the ad agency in a world of collaborative brands?

Agencies are part curator—they have to be extremely creative in the partnerships they help bring together and be the unifying creative voice across those different channels or partners. And at the heart of the community there has to be a very clear north star, an identity. People are still forming a relationship to those [collaborative] brands in a similar way that they formed a relationship to product brands. So the basic function of advertising doesn’t change—but the whole idea of sitting in a room and coming up with an idea and pushing it out is dead. It’s a bottom-up world, that’s the reality.

You’ve got to have people that fundamentally think in an interconnected way and look at a problem in a whole new light. I think that needs a different breed of agencies, a different breed of creative people.

When people talk about Airbnb, it’s like Harley-Davidson; they’ll tattoo it! They are evangelists. And that’s essentially what brands and advertising people have always tried to do—create a heart and soul, create evangelists. It’s just that the way of going about it is fundamentally different.

Does Collaborative Consumption differ between markets and from the developed to the developing world? We’re seeing a lot of conspicuous consumption in China and other emerging markets.

We intentionally did not cover the developing world because I think it’s a whole other book. We focused on countries where hyper-consumption has become the fabric of society over the past 50-plus years. These countries are all experiencing the same convergence of a global financial crisis, environmental awareness and social technologies. So I couldn’t comment because the models of Collaborative Consumption would be totally different in the developing world.

But across the U.S., the U.K., New Zealand and everywhere else we looked at, they are surprisingly similar. There are different sectors that are taking off. For example, the U.K. is leading the way on social lending. If I have $100 to lend and you’ve got $100 to borrow, [a social lending service] will match me, like Zopa. You could say it’s really exploding there because everyone got beaten by the traditional banks and there was so much bad media that the market’s really ripe for it. Then there’s countries like Japan, where bike sharing’s going through the roof. And you could say that’s because of congestion and traffic.

You recently Tweeted from Auckland that you were surprised by how many Collaborative Consumption examples you were seeing. Do you find this a lot when you travel?

It’s a bit like learning a new word—you start to see that word absolutely everywhere. But the wonderful thing is that now people  send me examples from all around the world, from Brazil to Dubai to Tokyo. And I am blown away by how much is going on. When we started the book we had approximately 500 examples. When we finished we had 1,500, and I think now I have more than 5,000. The growth is insane.

One aspect that’s so powerful about Collaborative Consumption is you’ve got hyper-local examples of things that people are doing in their community. That can be as simple as starting a tool-sharing library. And then what you see happen is that tool-sharing library has this ripple effect. There was one that was built in Santa Rosa [California] that I wrote about on this wonderful site called Shareble.net, where the neighborhood’s actually changing. Because people are doing garden projects, they’re renovating their houses, and they’re coming together as a community. And then you start to see a food-sharing project emerge, you start to see a carpool emerge. So I like to think sharing is contagious. You’ve got this groundswell at the local level, and then you’ve got this massive interest at the business/venture capital level. And that’s when change happens, when both the macro and micro come together.

Have you been surprised by how mainstream anti-consumption sentiments have become?

I think the financial crash fundamentally shocked consumer behaviors and did a few things. On the negative side, it created a huge level of distrust towards big business and big government. But the flip side of that is, it’s actually pushing us back together. If you think of an elastic band, big business, big government and big consumerism pushed us further and further apart, and then that snapped and suddenly we’re all thrown back together.

How will this movement evolve once we get into a recovery?

I think it’s only going to grow. I think people have realized we have been living in an economic, social and environmental Ponzi scheme, and when one thing collapses, the whole thing falls. So I don’t think we’re going back in terms of consumer behaviors. And we’re only just beginning to see how technology is enabling us to share. So you can start to look at frictionless payment systems and augmented reality and social tagging and real-time technologies—and all that stuff is going to enable hyper-local sharing.

I honestly think the idea of owning certain things and holding onto them while they just become dead objects with no in-built intelligence is going to seem like an obsolete idea. The reason we’re not going back is, the last 50 years or 60 years, we’ve been treated as dumb consumers and we’ve built quite dumb objects. A lot of them are built to break—planned obsolescence is no secret. As objects like phones get smarter with their in-built intelligence, we’re becoming smarter around our own behaviors—and more empowered. We’re realizing that we shouldn’t just let big business and big brands tell us what we should buy and how we should live and how we should define ourselves. And that has nothing to do with the recession.

So post-recession, these new behaviors will remain as habits?

Well, they’re not new behaviors, that’s the thing. What the financial crash has done is brought back very old behaviors, very intrinsic behaviors. We’re born and bred to share and cooperate. But we were told to build our own little fiefdoms; we were told to live in an age of hyper-individualism. I think what the financial crash has done is start a massive global debate on the culture and the economy around consumerism: Is it healthy, and does it make you happy? And is it healthy on a personal level but also on an economic level? It’s almost like the genie’s out of the bottle.

Stay tuned for more material from our interview with Rachel Botsman next month.

3 Responses to "Q&A with Rachel Botsman, co-author of ‘What’s Mine Is Yours’"

1 | Kat Gordon

September 27th, 2010 at 7:50 pm

Avatar

Excellent interview! I am picking up Rachel’s book on my way home…from the library (in the spirit of shared local resources). As a mom-marketing expert, this is a trend I have been watching explode in recent years. Moms are natural sharers and there is so much wastefulness in the “stuff” of childhood. It’s the perfect storm for sharing sites like Zwaggle, ThredUP, and ShareSomeSugar. As geo-local features of smart phones become more advanced, I can only imagine how pervasive collaborative consumption will become.

2 | Pokerspiel

September 30th, 2010 at 8:36 am

Avatar

I must digg your post so other folks can see it, very useful, I had a hard time finding the results searching on the web, thanks.

- Murk

3 | Leonor Samperi

October 28th, 2010 at 7:21 am

Avatar

Interesting article and one which should be more widely known about in my view. Your level of detail is good and the clarity of writing is excellent. I have bookmarked it for you so that others will be able to see what you have to say.

Comment Form

SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY EMAIL NEWSLETTER:

New Trend Report: The Future of Payments & Currency

JWT AnxietyIndex

Things to Watch

  • Snapcash
    November 19, 2014 | 4:54 pm


    Disruption in the payments sphere is opening the way for social media brands to act as intermediaries between consumers and their money, as we note in our report on payments and currency. Facebook is said to be planning a P2P payments feature for Messenger, South Korea’s KakaoTalk announced a PayPal-like service in September, and Line is creating a mobile service that will let users make on- and offline purchases. Now, Snapchat is partnering with Square to enable payments between users, as explained in this video’s energetic retro musical number.

    After users (U.S. only and 18-plus only) enter debit card info, they simply send a cash amount within a text. While Snapchat’s recent data breaches may give some users pause, the P2P payments space is a smart place to be as young consumers get accustomed to services like Venmo that make it easy and even fun to pay friends. —Marian Berelowitz

  • Payment in a heartbeat
    November 11, 2014 | 5:26 pm

    Nymi-paywith

    Our recent report on the future of payments and currency spotlights the rise of biometric payments—using a unique physical characteristic to authenticate transactions—which promise to greatly improve security and help remove friction. So far we’ve seen systems that rely on fingerprints (e.g., Apple Pay) and the palm’s unique vein payment (see Quixter). Now, the startup Bionym is exploring ways to harness its Nymi wristband, which uses the wearer’s unique cardiac rhythm as authentication, for payments.

    Bionym is linking with MasterCard and the Royal Bank of Canada for a test in which an NFC chip in the wristband enables contactless payments. The company, which is looking to license its technology into other wearables, recently raised $14 million in a Series A funding round and has racked up 10,000 preorders for the Nymi. —Marian Berelowitz

    Image credit: Nymi

  • Vegetable co-stars
    November 4, 2014 | 6:31 pm

    veggies_4

    “Vegetable co-stars” is one of our 100 Things to Watch in 2014—the idea that veggies are gaining a higher profile on restaurant menus—and more star chefs are indeed embracing this trend. José Andrés and his ThinkFood restaurant group plan to open Beefsteak (as in tomatoes), a vegetable-focused fast casual eatery in Washington, D.C., next year. The Washington Post also points to chef Roy Choi’s new greenhouse-like Commissary in L.A., which says it serves “good food and drink based around plants as the foundation.”

    “Chefs around the country, and the globe, are pushing meat from the center of the plate—and sometimes off it altogether,” notes The Wall Street Journal, citing examples like Alain Ducasse revamping his menu at the posh Plaza Athénée in Paris. Catering to a growing group of diners looking to eat less meat, vegetable-heavy dishes also offer new opportunities for creativity. —Marian Berelowitz

    Image credit: Plaza Athénée

  • Xiaomi zooms ahead
    October 30, 2014 | 4:44 pm

    Xiaomi, which we included on our 100 Things to Watch in 2014 list, is now the world’s third-largest smartphone maker, according to IDC’s Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker. The young company has seen triple-digit year-over-year growth in smartphone shipments, per IDC, surging ahead of both LG and Lenovo. Often described as the “Apple of China,” Xiaomi released its first phone just three years ago; its latest, Mi4, is an iPhone clone that runs on a modified version of Android.

    The company is expanding beyond China into India and Singapore, and planning to enter a slew of other growth markets, including Russia, Turkey, Brazil and Mexico. For more on whether Chinese brands can succeed on the world stage, see our report Remaking “Made in China.”Marian Berelowitz

    Image credit: Xiaomi

     

  • Money & messaging apps
    October 23, 2014 | 11:13 am

    LINE_icon02

    Given the primary function of mobile messaging apps and their technical capabilities, money transfer and payments are an alluring proposition, as outlined in our new report on payments and currency. Snapchat filed two trademarks in July that indicate a potential move into peer-to-peer payments. The recently announced Line Pay will let Line users make purchases through their Line accounts, send funds to each other, and split costs using a “Dutch Pay” feature. Line Pay will launch in Japan and, as Tech in Asia reports, serve as “an entrance to new industries” thanks to integration with the new Line Taxi service and Line Wow, for food delivery. In South Korea, KakaoTalk launched the PayPal-like Kakao Pay in September, and a remittance service, Bank Wallet Kakao, is in the works. —Marian Berelowitz

    Image credit: Line

  • The #TimsDark Experiment
    October 14, 2014 | 3:46 pm

    To entice customers into tasting its new dark roast, Canadian fast food chain Tim Hortons, with the help of JWT Canada, created a surprise immersive experience. A store in Quebec was wrapped in material that blocked all light from the outdoors. Patrons entered warily and, once inside, heard a staff member (who was wearing night vision goggles) guiding them through the dark. At the counter, customers were handed a cup of the dark roast—the brand’s first new blend in 50 years—with the darkness heightening their sense of taste. When the lights came on, the patrons saw they were on camera.

    The #TimsDark Experiment has garnered YouTube views and some press attention, and shows how creatively imagined immersive experiences—one of our 10 Trends for 2014—can encourage consumers to engage with a brand.

  • Bitcoin bank Circle
    October 7, 2014 | 4:40 pm

    Circle

    In late September, the startup Circle launched a web app that effectively functions as a bitcoin bank. Using a debit card or bank account, users transfer funds to Circle, which converts the money to bitcoin at no fee. Circle also insures this money at no cost. The company aims to make bitcoin more accessible via consumer-friendly design and is aiming to take on traditional banks and companies like PayPal, as The Guardian reports. Next up: Android and iOS Circle apps.

    Circle co-founder Jeremy Allaire gave a keynote at the Inside Bitcoins conference in April, citing the need for a “killer app” to bring bitcoin into the mainstream. Now Circle seems to be taking the lead, and others are sure to follow. —Nick Ayala

    Image credit: Circle

  • High-tech tasting
    October 2, 2014 | 6:00 pm

    Nanosensor

    Thailand got a lot of buzz this week with an innovative idea: a taste-tester robot, or electronic tongue, that’s programmed to distinguish authentic Thai dishes from wanna-be’s. Artificial tongues aren’t new but have been evolving. Most recently, Danish researchers developed a nanosensor that mimics “what happens in your mouth when you drink wine,” enabling winemakers to control astringency very early on. In Spain, researchers created a beer-tasting robot that can distinguish between varieties of brew.

    Meanwhile, advanced technology can also create recipes: IBM has touted how Watson, its “cognitive computing system,” can analyze the components of ingredients to come up with novel ideas for dishes; find a few of them here. —Marian Berelowitz

    Image credit: Aarhus Universitet

  • Marriage gets marginalized
    September 25, 2014 | 5:00 pm

    One of our 10 Trends for 2012 was Marriage Optional: More people around the world are living together or remaining solo instead of marrying. Pew reports this week that 1 in 5 Americans age 25 and up have never married, a fundamental shift since 1960, when only about 1 in 10 could say the same. Millennials are especially ambivalent: Two-thirds of 18- to 29-year-olds surveyed by Pew agree that “society is just as well off if people have priorities other than marriage and children” vs. 53 percent of the next generation up (age 30 to 49).

    Europe is seeing a similar move away from marriage, driven by “austerity, generational crisis and apathy towards the institution,” notes The Guardian. It says weddings are at historical lows in some nations; last year Italy recorded the fewest since World War I. For a look at how changing marriage patterns are affecting families, see our report Meet the New Family. —Marian Berelowitz

    Image credit: JD Hancock

     

  • Room-sharing service Breather
    September 16, 2014 | 3:30 pm

    Breather

    Described as the “Zipcar for rooms,” Breather is an app that enables access to “beautiful, practical spaces” that can be rented anywhere from 30 minutes to a whole day. While sharing-economy players like LiquidSpace and PivotDesk offer work and meeting spaces, Breather positions its rooms as homey spots that can serve a range of purposes (though not, the founder assures, seedy ones). Rooms include the basics—a desk, a couch, Wi-Fi—as well as some fun touches like a candy jar. Lockitron technology lets users unlock doors with their mobile phones. Breather is available in New York, Montreal and San Francisco, and recently raised $6.5 million in venture capital, citing plans to “own every major market in America.” —Hallie Steiner

    Image credit: Breather

  • RSSArchive for Things to Watch »