November 17, 2010

Part 2: Q&A with Rachel Botsman, co-author of ‘What’s Mine Is Yours’

Posted by: in North America

In September we ran the first part of our Q&A with Rachel Botsman, co-author with Roo Rodgers of What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. The book outlines “a quiet but powerful revolution of collaboration” that’s flourishing online (Zipcar, CouchSurfing, et al.) and, increasingly, offline as well. In Part 1 we talked about what this mega-trend means for brands and marketers; the rest of our conversation takes a wider look at Collaborative Consumption, including some of its most recent manifestations.

Your book makes the interesting point that Collaborative Consumption is driven by self-interest—the realization that working for the collective good is the best way to help yourself. Why are people arriving at this conclusion now?

People are realizing how they can actually express their individualism as part of a community. Facebook is essentially about talking about yourself, but talking about it amongst a group. So we’re getting very used to this—“me” and “we” are sitting side by side, if you like. And linked to that, we’re also getting used to growing up sharing files and knowledge and video and ideas and our daily movements, and now those collaborative behaviors are entering other areas of our lives. So sharing a bike just makes sense to us; social lending just seems intuitive.

I do believe it’s ignorant to say, “People have a collective mind-set.” We still are self-interested. But self-interest doesn’t have to be a negative thing. People who join a food coop, for example—they’ll talk about benefits that are unique to them, like they get to eat healthier, but then they’ll also talk about how much they enjoy doing their four hours of voluntary time.

You note that Collaborative Consumption started online and is driven by technology but is now moving offline. What are some of the ways this is happening?

I want to caveat by saying that I have a real issue with the online/offline distinction. It’s something that’s getting really blurry, and it’s something I’ve given more thought to since the book was finished. What’s really interesting is online models that are realizing that people still need to meet offline. So Swaptree, for example, which is one of the largest swap/trading platforms for unwanted media, they’re realizing people want to meet and swap in the flesh, as well as online. Same with a lot of the trade bartering platforms.

People like bartering services virtually, but they also love coming together and having a photography skills session or a cooking lesson. So people experience this community virtually and then they want it in the real world as well.

Location-based technologies is another thing that’s blurring the virtual and real worlds.

I could talk about location-based till the cows come home because it’s got a few very important things. One, a huge theme in the book is trust between strangers. And within location-based services, I don’t think people think of other members as strangers—you’re essentially taking advice, whether it’s where you get your haircut or what sandwiches you’d order, from someone you don’t know, so you’re working that muscle, you’re reinforcing that behavioral dynamic.

If you think about what Foursquare is, it’s hyper-local sharing of information, and who knows where that will go. We’ll be able to pinpoint exactly where something is available to share or where someone is who can walk your dog and what they can give in return. I believe it will make products and services better because it forces a level of transparency that is probably frightening for companies. I also think it can help bring back local, independent shops, because they can customize what they’re offering through Foursquare because big brands are never going to have the radar to be able to do so.

You devote a chapter to the idea that designers will be key to driving this trend. Do you think the design community is ready for this challenge?

The conversation that’s going on in the design industry is actually more sophisticated than in the brand and advertising industries. They’re ready to go. I think it’s whether the clients are ready. I could not think of a more exciting time to be a designer than right now.

You mentioned seeing a lot of new examples of Collaborative Consumption since the book was printed. What are some of the more interesting ones?

Peer-to-peer car sharing is fascinating. If you think of the evolution, we’ve gone from traditional car ownership to car-sharing companies to ride-sharing platforms, and now we’re realizing, “Wait, that car that sits idle an average of 23 hours a day, we can make money from it, it’s an asset.” If you can create the trust between people to share probably one of their most valuable assets, nothing is off bounds. I also think it represents people looking around them and going—80 percent of the stuff we own we never use or we use less than once a month—“I could make money off that.” It seems really basic, and it’s really easy.

It makes so much sense. And the technology is now there so that you don’t even have to have the coordination of keys, because you put a device in your car and it’s a swipe system, just like on Zipcar. And if your car’s gone for more than the time it was signed up on, you can lock down that car.

The other category that really excites, and I think we are just in its pre-infancy, is virtual currencies. Virtual currencies have been around in the gaming world for a while, but I think it’s another ramification of the [downturn] that people are starting to realize, “Money was constructed as well; money was just invented as a common language to exchange.” And we’re seeing all alternatives forms of currency, whether it’s local currencies or social currencies or bartering points, and that’s really interesting because of the tax implications.

Any other new directions you see this trend evolving right now?

The other one that’s just this year—have you heard of social objects like Stickybits and Itizen? It’s the whole idea of socially tagging or tracking your things and attaching a story to them. That’s where you can start seeing the ancillary services come in—I think those communities that start to form around objects become the next Flickr, the next Facebook. It comes back down to the shared experiences we can have around an object that become far more fascinating than the object itself, in most instances.

You feel like it’s OK to be attached to material things when there’s an emotional connection there?

Well, people have said to me, “Well, you own stuff.” And I say, Yeah, but I own very few clothes—I buy beautiful, well-made clothes that are going to last for years. We own very little furniture, but it either has utility or it’s what I call a “one for life” product. I think it’s really interesting—brands like Rolex, Montblanc are doing phenomenally well. Because luxury now has a “one for life” meaning to it.

Durability may be the next luxury. Look at the number of young people wearing their grandfather’s watch or carrying that old piece of luggage. Again, it’s becoming very attached to things with a history or nostalgia, versus being new.

Do you think the next luxury item or status symbol will be sustainable products like electric vehicles?

I have a real issue with the term sustainable or greener products. Arguably, they are very important, like the electric car, but they are still dependent on the same consumer model. Seventh Generation is still about selling more units of Seventh Generation. It hasn’t fundamentally changed the way we think about consumerism. The Prius will still sit outside your house 23 hours a day. Where it gets exciting to me is when Toyota actually sells their Prius with a peer-to-peer car-sharing scheme. That’s what truly sustainable brands should be doing right now.

Solar panels are great examples of Collaborative Consumption. One, they are realizing that a rental model is far more appealing to people because the idea of owning these $50,000 cells feels like a responsibility. The other thing is a very good idea—there’s a company called 1BOG (One Block Off the Grid) that goes into neighborhoods and gets people to aggregate together and buy in economies of scale, in bulk.

You talk to 1BOG and what they say is, the power of their business model is not selling the solar panels, it’s that they have pods of people that have already committed that “We will do things together to buy things.” If I was the electric car companies, I would go into those same neighborhoods and say “You could buy three electric cars between you for 70 percent less, and then here’s the platform to share them.”

Any particularly unique or surprising examples of Collaborative Consumption you’ve seen lately?

It’s really simple ones that blow me away. Like the parking spots ones. There’s loads of them emerging where people are realizing, “The parking space in my garage is an unused asset, why don’t I rent it out?” There’s a wonderful story of a church in Islington [London] that signed up to ParkatMyHouse, and because they’re right by Islington station, they’re now making 50,000 pounds a year and they don’t have to do any other fundraising.

And the other ones that are just getting started are shared studio spaces, like TechShop, where you’ve got the renaissance concept of artists and makers all coming together in these big workshops and saying, “If we group together, we can have robot-making machines, and that’s a lot better than the saw in my garage. And I didn’t know nanoscience, but the guy sitting next to me does.” I think big companies that rely on R&D as their point of uniqueness should be—not scared, but they’ve got to change their model because innovations are going to come out of these collective forms. Even if you look at the way companies do open innovation, it’s still very much through virtual channels.

What are your personal favorite forms of Collaborative Consumption?

I am officially an AirBnB addict. I’m doing my book tour on AirBnB out of choice. I spent a lot of time on the road as a consultant and a lot of time in hotels, and I always had an issue that I’d be in the most amazing country relying on the concierge to tell me where to go for dinner and the rooms were all the same. What’s amazing with AirBnB is not just the people you meet but the places you get access to—I can stay in homes for $150 a night that I could never afford. And the thing we’ve started to enjoy doing is we rent out our place when we go away, so our holidays are net neutral. We’re making money off ours to pay for the places we’re staying in.

And finally, name one person, place or product not related to your business that we should keep an eye on in the near future?

As far as sectors that I think are really hot that are related to this space—if I was an investor, I’d be totally looking at social lending, I’d be looking at crowd-funding models. But they do relate to what I’m doing.

I think it’s a very exciting time to be involved in what luxury means. I don’t necessarily agree with it, but I think there’s going to be brands that really break through by making luxury that [taps into] that nostalgia, that durability. Yesterday I bought an $800 pair of glasses because these glasses are going to last me five years; they’re made with the very best materials. And I hope those brands do become mores sustainable as well because they have the budgets and the design talent and the scale to fix their value chains and really lead the way. So the category to watch is luxury sustainable brands.

1 Response to "Part 2: Q&A with Rachel Botsman, co-author of ‘What’s Mine Is Yours’"

1 | Kat Gordon

November 19th, 2010 at 4:57 pm

Avatar

Rachel, I read both parts of your interview and your book, and am in awe of this movement. I’ve been talking about it to clients and friends, all of us guessing how else collaborative consumption might change our lives. One thing I didn’t find mentioned anywhere is around taxes. How will the government deal with the rise of bartered goods and services? Will taxes still be owed even though no money changed hands?

Comment Form

SXSW: Raging Against the Machine

SXSW: How Brands Can Get ‘Circular’ and Why They Must

New Trend Report: The Circular Economy

2014 iPad App

Updates

Sign up for Email Updates

JWT AnxietyIndex

Things to Watch

  • Nestlé’s animal-welfare standards
    August 28, 2014 | 10:00 am

    Nestle

    We wrote about rising concerns over treatment of the animals that people eat back in 2012 as brands including Burger King, McDonald’s and Hellmann’s pledged to institute more humane practices. We also included Humane Food among our Things to Watch for 2013. The trend recently picked up more steam with Nestlé’s announcement of animal welfare standards for its suppliers worldwide, following an investigation by the group Mercy for Animals.

    “The move is one of the broadest-reaching commitments to improving the quality of life for animals in the food system,” notes The New York Times, “and it is likely to have an impact on other companies that either share the same suppliers or compete with Nestlé.” Observed the influential blogger Food Babe: “People want to know where their food comes from, and in order to survive the next decade, the food industry will have to change.” —Marian Berelowitz

    Image credit: Nestlé

  • Alternative waters
    August 19, 2014 | 1:59 pm

    Vertical Water

    With the coconut water craze going strong, watch for more variations on H2O thanks to consumer interest in more natural alternatives to soda and openness to novel products. Antioxidant-rich maple water (made from maple sap) is gaining attention, while almond water from the startup Victoria’s Kitchen has secured space at Whole Foods and Target. As the AP reports, there’s also cactus, birch and artichoke water—made from either water extracted from the plant or boiled with the ingredient in question—whose makers tout their vitamin and mineral content, as well as their infection-fighting properties. —Allison Kruk

    Image credit: Vertical Water

  • Smart mannequins
    August 13, 2014 | 5:01 pm

    Iconeme

    One of our Things to Watch in 2014, beacons have been popping up everywhere from airports to restaurants to museums. But the biggest pickup for these devices—low-cost transmitters that use Bluetooth to precisely track consumers’ mobile phones and send targeted content—has been among retailers. Now, British retailers including House of Fraser, Hawes & Curtis and Bentalls are testing mannequins outfitted with VMbeacon technology from the startup Iconeme.

    A “smart mannequin” enables nearby shoppers with a related mobile app to get details about what it’s wearing and how to find the products in the store or buy them online. The big question is whether customers will be motivated to opt in; skeptics say the technology doesn’t yet provide enough real benefit. —Allison Kruk

    Image credit: Iconeme

  • De-teching apps
    August 7, 2014 | 10:55 am

    De-teching—the idea that more people will choose to temporarily log off—was one of our 10 Trends for 2011, and in our 2014 trend Mindful Living, we discussed the idea that digitally immersed consumers will try to use technology more mindfully. Perhaps ironically, several new apps aim to help people do so.

    Moment tracks phone use and alerts users when they reach their self-imposed daily limit. Pause is “designed to help us reconnect with real life”; it encourages people to use Airplane Mode and engage in real-world activities, and attempts to turn this behavior into a game among friends. Finally, Menthal is part of a research project out of Germany that helps users find out, “Are you in control of your smartphone? Or is your smartphone controlling you?” —Marian Berelowitz

  • Intuitive eating
    July 29, 2014 | 5:00 pm

    Veggies

    As spotlighted in our 10 Trends for 2014 report, people are becoming more interested in Mindful Living, including the notion of eating more mindfully. And with consumers showing declining interest in dieting, the idea of “intuitive eating”—paying closer attention to the body’s hunger signals rather than following a strict regimen—has been steadily gaining traction. Recent media mentions include articles in Fitness and New Zealand’s Stuff, and a Refinery 29 writer is blogging about adopting the practice. With a recent analysis of studies finding that intuitive eating can be a successful strategy for people who are overweight or obese, watch for more consumers to embrace this anti-diet philosophy. —Allison Kruk

    Image credit: Theresa Kinsella

  • Chinese mega-cities
    July 24, 2014 | 1:15 pm

    Tianjin

    China, home to the world’s second largest rural population, is expected to add close to 300 million more urbanites by 2030, when Shanghai and Beijing will likely account for two of the world’s Top 5 mega-cities, according to new UN research. “We are observing one of the most significant economic transformations the world has seen: 21st-century China is urbanizing on a scale 100 times that seen in 19th-century Britain and at 10 times the speed,” notes a new McKinsey paper on cities and luxury markets. China’s wealth will be concentrated in these urban areas: Over the next decade, McKinsey expects Beijing, Tianjin, Guangzhou, Chongqing and Shenzhen, in addition to Hong Kong, to join the list of “top luxury cities.” —Marian Berelowitz

    Image credit: Jakob Montrasio

  • Brands + Google Glass
    July 15, 2014 | 6:09 pm

    SPG

    As Google Glass makes its way into the hands of more people (last month it became available in the U.K.), brands are experimenting with the new possibilities that the platform affords. In March, Kenneth Cole became the first to launch a marketing campaign—the “Man Up for Mankind Challenge”—through a Glass app. Users were challenged to perform and document good deeds for the chance to win a prize.

    Starwood’s new Glass app, billed as the first such app from the hospitality sector, lets people voice-search its properties, view photos and amenities, get directions and book rooms. An array of other marketers have turned out apps for early adopters, from Sherman Williams’ ColorSnap Glass (easily create a paint chip that mirrors anything in view) to Fidelity (delivers daily market quotes for Glass wearers). —Tony Oblen

    Image credit: SPG

  • Ugly produce
    July 10, 2014 | 2:45 pm

    Intermarche

    Ugly Produce, on our list of 100 Things to Watch in 2014, is proliferating in Europe, thanks in part to government efforts to reduce the 89 million tons of food wasted in Europe each year. In France, Intermarché has been getting buzz for creating a produce section dedicated to “Inglorious Fruits and Vegetables”; a whimsical ad campaign reportedly drove a 24 percent rise in store traffic.

    U.K. supermarket Waitrose recently began selling packs of tomatoes that are misshapen or have fallen off the vine naturally. And in Portugal, Fruta Feia (“Ugly Fruit”) is a cooperative launched in late 2013 that sells unsightly produce that would have gone to waste. Per The New York Times, the group already has a waiting list of 1,000 customers. In line with one of our 10 Trends for 2014, Proudly Imperfect, watch for ugly produce to catch on with both retailers and shoppers. —Jessica Vaughn

    Image credit: Intermarché

  • The $1.25 Cube
    July 3, 2014 | 12:30 pm

    As we outline in Immersive Experiences, one of our 10 Trends for 2014 and Beyond, entertainment and narratives are becoming more enveloping in a bid to capture consumers’ imagination and attention. An immersive project from JWT Israel, a winner of the Cannes Chimera challenge, aims to help people experience what it’s like to live in extreme poverty. Once it’s created, the cube will create a multisensory experience that uses tools like augmented reality to simulate sights, sounds and smells and elicit certain feelings. Participants can exit only when the person in line behind them inserts $1.25, a metaphor for the collaborative efforts needed to fight poverty. The aim is for the cube to travel to international events like the Davos conference in order to influence global leaders. —Hallie Steiner

    Image credit: JWT Israel

  • Google’s Android Auto
    June 26, 2014 | 3:00 pm

     

    Android

    The connected car is rapidly becoming a reality. Fast 4G LTE connections are turning vehicles into hot spots that come with a data plan, while Apple’s iOS and Google’s Android are making their way onto dashboards. This week Google introduced Android Auto, with the first compatible cars expected by year-end. Apple’s similar CarPlay, which turns the car into a platform for an iPhone’s content, was announced in March and is included in new Ferrari, Mercedes-Benz and Volvo models.

    Car-based app ecosystems will provide relevant info (traffic, maps, vehicle diagnostics, restaurant suggestions) and entertainment, combined with safety precautions like voice control. As we outline in our mobile trends report, connected cars—complete with Internet hot spots, a suite of apps and sensors that communicate—will eventually link up with drivers’ homes, mobile devices and other gadgets to form a seamless system. —Marian Berelowitz

    Image credit: Android

  • RSSArchive for Things to Watch »